Re: Function for deleting a key binding in a sparse keymap

[Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>]

Kim F. Storm wrote:

>This seems to be quite accurate now... but there is one thing I
>don't understand...
>  
>
I am glad someone is checking this ...   :-)

>  
>
>>*) Characters that are self-inserting are translated according to
>>   `translation-table-for-input'. If a character is self-inserting then
>>   you are ready.
>>    
>>
>
>How do you know that a character is self-inserting at this stage?
>You only find that out by looking it up in the keymaps, and you
>haven't got to that yet at this stage (unless this somehow is
>the second pass?)
>  
>
Some kind of magic thinking I guess ;-)  -- it is funny how you 
sometimes can fool yourself into thinking you know something. Maybe 
because there are too many unknown things at the moment. You are right 
of course. I have moved it to a note.

>
>
>May I suggest that you add an example of which part of emacs currently
>uses each of these methods, e.g.
>  
>
I have taken your examples. Before I send a new version: How do I make a 
cross-reference in Texinfo to cua-mode and viper here?