From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Function for deleting a key binding in a sparse keymap Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:04:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4395C4BA.4070707@student.lu.se> References: <439382B9.7020802@student.lu.se> <439470ED.9010809@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133889236 1002 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 17:13:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 18:13:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjgIr-0006db-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:08:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjgJ2-0003Pj-P2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjgFj-000232-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjgFg-00021Y-Us for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjgFf-00021Q-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.11.98] (helo=pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjgGL-0004Se-GM; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:05:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) id 4394465B0005FAC2; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:04:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47062 Archived-At: Richard M. Stallman wrote: > >This function makes sense; I see how it could be used. Do we really > >need it now? > > > > > I just wanted to use it ;-) > >Why did you want to use it? > When starting a minor mode I read some key definitions outside that mode. If they have a certain value I define new values for those keys in that minor mode. The next time I enter that minor mode the key definitions outside may however be different so I want to remove the key bindings I added when exiting the minor mode.