From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FW: Emacs non-ascii characters Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:14:35 +0000 Message-ID: <438254DB.4050603@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132615003 32170 80.91.229.2 (21 Nov 2005 23:16:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Russell , Emacs-Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 00:16:41 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeKsr-0002Y2-6K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:15:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeKsq-0003Un-JF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:15:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EeKsH-0003Qt-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EeKsC-0003NY-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:14:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeKsC-0003NO-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:14:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [217.207.198.106] (helo=exchange.integrasp.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EeKsB-0004RA-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:14:56 -0500 Original-Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exchange.integrasp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id RFBH0C85; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:10:01 -0000 Original-Received: from 83.67.23.108 ([83.67.23.108] helo=[10.0.0.27]) by ASSP-nospam ; 21 Nov 05 23:09:59 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Drew Adams In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46416 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: >This makes me wonder if `C-\' isn't a bad binding for such a command. Should >toggling the input method be on a key binding that is easy to hit by >mistake? > >I don't use that command, so I don't know if it needs to be on a quickly hit >key. > IMHO it does. If you are writing multilingual text (eg a programming language with comments in your native language), then you need to switch between input methods very frequently.