From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vinicius Jose Latorre Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: version comparison functions Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:41:47 -0300 Message-ID: <430FA8BB.5020106@ig.com.br> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1125101870 12592 80.91.229.2 (27 Aug 2005 00:17:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 27 02:17:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8oN6-0003U4-Sp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:16:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8oR4-0002TZ-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:20:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E8oQs-0002T1-Cg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E8oQq-0002S5-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8oOE-0001tn-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [200.221.4.194] (helo=smtp.uol.com.br) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E8nut-0000hh-Kg; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [201.12.73.127] (unknown [201.12.73.127]) by scorpion3.uol.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BCA7EA4; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:45:36 -0300 (BRT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050729 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42439 Archived-At: Ok, folks, should I remove all version string comparison stuff from subr.el? Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On 8/26/05, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> How often does that happen? >> And for those rare cases where some piece of elisp code uses a version >> comparison, how many of those could advantageously use >> a feature-test instead? I thought we'd discussed and rejected such >> version >> comparison functions in the past. > > > Yeah. That was my point, too.