From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs's set-frame-size can not work well with gnome-shell? Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:11:46 +0100 Message-ID: <42dabe13-c265-1bdc-a414-9407198511bf@gmx.at> References: <2056a194.3971.16f8d4dd4c5.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <44dfe3ee-5c08-9a60-a642-8411c8e22921@yandex.ru> <35329f93-d7a9-e845-ddb4-9c4edec5fb43@yandex.ru> <53c7798d-3022-d4bd-af56-ea4a5181a887@gmx.at> <15405719-d58d-44db-f1df-ad3bb272b2fc@yandex.ru> <55a1b592-c980-7c6b-4c82-fcbfd7e97585@yandex.ru> <8401253c-946d-c57c-ca35-6a607d0f7f9a@gmx.at> <562ccf08-c620-8f78-bc14-590bbf81b3d5@gmx.at> <358fa7da-deb6-f4c5-6b18-9a832146937e@yandex.ru> <99c7d91f-2848-ad2e-78fc-f53a8dcf4f99@yandex.ru> <16c6c6e9-d7e7-0731-ee42-bfb5c9c9d083@gmx.at> <33feeaee-24c4-468f-ef4e-0d5d8955891c@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="74771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Dmitry Gutov , tumashu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 21 17:15:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1itwBH-000JCa-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:15:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57430 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itwBG-0001a0-Dn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itw8I-00079d-Ic for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itw8H-0004Yy-Hv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:39161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itw8H-0004YN-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:12:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1579623108; bh=ZIrSUOY67IomJRdnOwqpON6gHXWSWLeKryyWCqrMcfM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ThsU5kkh9beY5aq3oMNgeIIh4g6QoqFtGFwKWXiBafqjgGcDO6/B2Xb8xR6P0YixE 4gURA0GIqIZOUXwU6SThwhGZ7+6Frj+IhF2faHXwHMk6U7VNVH6qO3m+4ny6ufBfQT rpsrWpDelL+6ePxQirZ/tk2h0hvD4cKXRfgMLncs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.38]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mzyyk-1jnhwr3ekg-00x2Tm; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:11:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <33feeaee-24c4-468f-ef4e-0d5d8955891c@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vYWpZrU8xpB/InxxVr/WswSqLtNV5EwB7SD4W4RmJSfC+3ix1C/ dnVgQNjv2f7TqjZN4GHSu94OX4OpbHoUVzm8g2ud/kNgR7wdFgLqpeRrQp5nVJGGl48mySV BYjv7wm0+uw/boNOAYnEXCkD0fGTYmYOzJF/CDA7F218Pq3CgD2KFxe+icd6n+5acftmqS/ EeBUiDmKPW4oV3/j2B0sA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:i3Xhrq1WTDA=:6xJ0xHMT8aQd7kduL+zda1 Oh5r4D+UTvwd4JOJ5oW050iV76QenEFDN+sFO5pCFyEwB5AWFOKVvQlfPw/Wcs5R9ZwVA87Wc xk6LDxX+bvtCjSAG7rE4mtX9XcFSoo+wH8MJxfHMgxNRwTUSbc4mwlV5oZCyhWf8cfcSbERjK QUqb9s3IPD/pdBZmEzcBWpx/7LD1Gw/pxL0ryoCjIgGgX8hRWaHdGpZbrlSMANhYKo9NUTqU+ sIhPWg8fD4i9DDrGbvuiqREvfyyE6TIXSwrLMRAlHDHIgWOL76w5zf+vo9XACrOm8jF5LRCm2 MfUxm16/h1aMFyk2NOo6vtgVbVkmleHMXaXO7ducChqXnCUAGxNIPnTxi/zQ1rO7I/lRC1CNh 5ZnyKvJ4T00GhnfryS6Ag04RAeJ0d6lzYzcr590H5/R0l7cMmAb6raNIZxWRAsNgvuFyvN1LK dzytHRJ+MWS3vPWAnSLPS3TLEWLSQDTAxCnoPzyF5tCsCCKYrtnamgEnXgM/9lAnDizdy52Jp rj7lEU2iIihBM8P/zl6zK5x6OvBUfIhfiENXuzagdSiZPE3iIR+sjtaAagxDWAiBkhXQF/bj7 K9kMLuMGf0STNnUoXCHxv4CyrCGE7ACOqCx1hA8QRvqTda9pglDNXkA0YU4b1ZY31KbCyBlzh qUIqC2F2cPdyuVonnOIKBOBik0difRAnxHwVfTNUgF6t5TBi7M0tx1YgnTicxdrTq/huep5mO Ogc76axL8l52V9/p247dIef4VB0Uj9/jgvK7tVN+1oilpoYjrhHQyLujBj0SWwkJkBkGrBNa X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:244466 Archived-At: > No, I meant more practical usage of posframe as a library, where we > show/update tooltip after every character typed by the user. Without a timer-based delay? >> You mean the Lucid build is not any better in this regard than a GTK >> build making the frame invisible, resizing it and making it visible >> again? > > *If* I cycle visibility, yes. Even if "resizing" doesn't change the size. But cycling visibility is not necessary with Lucid to make resizing work. OK. So I conclude that the Lucid build is currently fully functional for you without having to cycle visibility. martin