From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Kevin Yu" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: w32 redisplay lags much more seriously when editing big files. Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:24:56 +0800 Message-ID: <42b562540807230124y588d41fdh616ca93d7352b36e@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_47181_25100616.1216801496300" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216801586 12533 80.91.229.12 (23 Jul 2008 08:26:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:26:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 23 10:27:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLZgj-0004oV-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:27:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51287 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLZfq-0004XH-D7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLZeg-0004D9-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLZed-0004BH-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:25:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59491 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLZec-0004BC-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.189]:29208) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KLZec-00048H-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so1025964tia.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:24:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=gV5PNj7j0StFVSetfm6GMvKGxJ3bFEppgGdHvcRqXwM=; b=rLRIzQfGz7/qNbR5/OS4vw85myuaQQWDTnPIjj7jqicNZYUrOqYRNYUgEPUPlsHMu4 dXu1lJ+zEL3vj/1fEdbVxJFgdDuMLDYfjwFNpMdE4dt+qWApUK/hRPVw4/vq/G/Krc6s 30SXog2zRbvmtCteDE+/62DKVN30UbCm5wYs4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=wLpf13doP4LGzy+vd86VVL3C7zRP+D0M8ECoEO8eNr0mHiM/RWqUUYLGuFi/Nty4Pn +3Fu/8iyR4AKRYsjlPPuwH9ho/8mP12W2M8SyFffFiG8yewD8Vg354i1r3ukwsREBWNP OtcJcGcHtY57FBMhXmzI5yUvpBaPdTqWBodvM= Original-Received: by 10.110.109.19 with SMTP id h19mr5519432tic.58.1216801496267; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.3.20 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:24:56 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101291 Archived-At: ------=_Part_47181_25100616.1216801496300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, All The performance issue of new backend on w32 has been talked a lot on this list. If you hold down the "C-n", you will see half of the window is blank when the cursor goes over the bottom line of window. I have tried it on a big file with 20000 lines. It lags much more in a big file than a small file (about 2000 lines). So the file size will affected redisplay time? I wish it'll help you guys to improve the performance on w32. Best wishes. Kevin ------=_Part_47181_25100616.1216801496300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Hi, All
     The performance issue of new backend on w32 has been talked a lot on this list. If you hold down the "C-n", you will see half of the window is blank when the cursor goes over the bottom line of window. I have tried it on a big file with 20000 lines. It lags much more in a big file than a small file (about 2000 lines). So the file size will affected redisplay time?
     I wish it'll help you guys to improve the performance on w32.
     Best wishes.

Kevin
------=_Part_47181_25100616.1216801496300--