From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: w32-pass-lwindow-to-system does not work as expected Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:22:24 +0200 Message-ID: <42CAFA10.9060304@student.lu.se> References: <42CADC1A.4060106@student.lu.se> <42CAE5D0.8050101@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120598964 6341 80.91.229.2 (5 Jul 2005 21:29:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 21:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 23:29:23 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpuxg-0005jm-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:28:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpuyx-0005Xh-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:29:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dputx-0003ha-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dputu-0003gD-LC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dputu-0003fq-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.164] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DpuyE-0000Cx-U2; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.205.6) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) id 42B94E290026EBC9; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 23:22:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40467 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40467 Jason Rumney wrote: >There are a few specific key combinations that the system grabs before >Emacs gets a chance to see them. This does not mean that the variables >Emacs uses to try to give the user more control over their keyboard >do not work at all. > Sorry for the somewhat harsh statement. What I really mean is that this can be very irritating and annoyning to a user if it is not clearly documented. Otherwise I think the intent is good. Actually what we have been discussing now is related to the problem with Alt-Tab. Whatever we do and decide this things should be documented and understood.