From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Hunter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TTY Vertical divider face? Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:54:56 -0400 Message-ID: <42C5E5E0.4050409@comcast.net> References: <877jgroo1i.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0jr1xmd.fsf@jurta.org> <87mzpisgbe.fsf@jurta.org> <87zmtbflkn.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120265704 10744 80.91.229.2 (2 Jul 2005 00:55:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 02:54:55 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoWHS-0006uF-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 02:54:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoWQ0-000490-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoWPp-00048W-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoWPn-00047p-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoWPn-00047K-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [204.127.198.35] (helo=rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DoWMu-0005zf-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 21:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.42.3] (pcp08774087pcs.mtlrel01.nj.comcast.net[68.36.32.221]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005070200550301300ro976e>; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:55:04 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Juri Linkov In-Reply-To: <87zmtbflkn.fsf@jurta.org> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40068 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40068 Juri Linkov wrote: > What about such a patch? I have tested it on GNU/Linux, but the > change in w32term.c is untested. I hope someone will test it > on Windows. FWIW, the patch looks okay on Windows. I customized vertical-border to make a pink window border. (I don't know why, but more importantly, I can.) -Dave