From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [rudalics@gmx.at: enlarge-window with preserve-before non-nil] Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:43:19 +0200 Message-ID: <42A428C7.3000506@swipnet.se> References: <427E756D.6070908@swipnet.se> <4286481B.6070702@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118054655 15864 80.91.229.2 (6 Jun 2005 10:44:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 12:44:05 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfF4B-00033B-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:42:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfFAS-00012I-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:49:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfF89-0000ew-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfF85-0000eH-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfF82-0000aA-Dc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DfF8K-0000jN-Fw; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([83.226.180.210] [83.226.180.210]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050606104346.HDMX26796.mxfep01.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:43:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38155 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38155 Richard Stallman wrote: >The incorrect structure is in i3, so I think it should eliminate i3. >The criterion for doing so is that i3 is a vchild of its parent >and also has a vchild. That should never occur. > >After the code operates on i3, putting it in place of i2, it check if >i3 is a vchild and has a vchild. If so, it should to eliminate i3, >putting w4 into its place in the structure, and make w3 be the next of >w5. > >Want to implement that? > >(The same thing should be done with hchild.) > > > Stefan Monnier wrote: >Whoever can do that, please sprinkle some corresponding asserts in the code. > > I finally checked in a fix for this, but I didn't feel I could add any asserts that I was sure about, sorry. Jan D.