From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Customizing Buffer-menu-buffer-face Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 09:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4285AB52.4040005@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116059830 1993 80.91.229.2 (14 May 2005 08:37:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 08:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 14 10:37:08 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWs8n-0007vv-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 10:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWs3A-0007bD-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrnZ-0004XU-3P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrlA-0003tC-9u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:12:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrgx-0002gH-Lf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 04:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWrRv-00052h-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 May 2005 07:45:00 -0000 Original-Received: from N916P013.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.109]) [62.47.58.109] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 14 May 2005 09:45:00 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37116 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37116 Is there any reason why `Buffer-menu-buffer-face' is customized in the `font-lock-highlighting-faces' group? The current choice (i) breaks the convention that all faces in this group are prefixed with "font-lock-" and (ii) falsely implies that this face is used by font-lock. Since the face is used in the mode-line why not customize it in the mode-line group? Similarly, what's the purpose of customizing `show-trailing-whitespace' and `trailing-whitespace' in the font-lock group?