From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Antialiased text on X11 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:51:05 +0100 Message-ID: <423D63A9.6000108@swipnet.se> References: <20050310231530.GH3992@boetes.org> <871xab1u3d.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <20050319165318.GP21120@boetes.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111319513 21180 80.91.229.2 (20 Mar 2005 11:51:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 20 12:51:53 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DCyxe-0005YV-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:51:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DCzEX-00068x-99 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:08:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DCzDM-0005qV-78 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DCzDK-0005pe-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DCzDK-0005p0-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DCyxc-0006Ke-My for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:51:16 -0500 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([83.226.180.210] [83.226.180.210]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050320115111.WWBV7011.mxfep01.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:51:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Han Boetes In-Reply-To: <20050319165318.GP21120@boetes.org> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34812 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34812 Han Boetes wrote: >>- if (s-> font == NULL) >>+ if (0 && s-> font == NULL) >> >> > >I suppose this is a mistake. > As the font is hardcoded it should always be found. It may be that in the case of Xft s->font is NULL always. I agree it looks strange, but I also use this device sometimes to "comment out" if/while/for statements. Jan D.