From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outgoing mail defaults Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:02:08 -0400 Message-ID: <41D75E0D-9F9E-4476-A6D3-93FA34156854@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300388547 1733 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2011 19:02:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 17 20:02:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0ISj-0006uW-7Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:02:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44722 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0ISi-00033m-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57275 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0ISc-0002yr-JF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:02:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0ISa-0002qV-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:47886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0ISa-0002qL-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: by iwl42 with SMTP id 42so3949138iwl.0 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=ukFg7fSC1GuKde9pjNYpuv4xSR8CS0JUwieH/sITt6k=; b=fiMV/ExKCfPg52wNcN/vbrTdMoRBpzrVq/f7Bel5NrqIXJjoly1zQe9aynAGzZWQCJ ljqY0624j3+DrNxW0x1pHXuuqfrEp3y0sGY+2ltgBYGthidCcoDJgvhksYRSY+7BFOw3 XoBcWe+GWNnisLwOlqcOyEZkj7jTaO1Vw6sGI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=W/RXCgWCi/fM3CQ9/OKbWswwc4I2RGyRwbRFh+GGMjI7/Ak7TKJFs8dShVmFjPtk9G u71P6TvXvRlAx8AkBrivOpafUcbjSDSiuAKGHiuqIjD3wdvjtsJXuVJwXgyQFfra/qfq XO9rsy09dkF1wSPEGbVEw1X5O+7+OGyxX/P1A= Original-Received: by 10.43.53.65 with SMTP id vp1mr309312icb.84.1300388531402; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from elin.psy.cmu.edu (ELIN.PSY.CMU.EDU [128.2.248.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm782913ibe.36.2011.03.17.12.02.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:02:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137360 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77919 Archived-At: On Mar 17, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > And the open SMTP server could also listen on an alternative port to > avoid firewall issues slightly more. Making it listen on port 80 would be easier than installing a = server-side script taking a POST request on port 80. OTOH, Ted's suggestion about the hashcash seems very attractive, = especially if the SMTP server would forward bug reports to other = packages in the process.