unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:06:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4185FC85.70100@swipnet.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1COWYL-0001lG-V3@fencepost.gnu.org>

Richard Stallman wrote:
>     Sorry, I misunderstood.  The timer_check is not run from popup_get_selection 
>     for popup menus because the argument do_timers is 0:
> 
> 	   if (do_timers && !XtAppPending (Xt_app_con))
> 	     timer_check (1);
> 
>     But for dialogs, do_timer is 1, so timers do get checked when a dialog is 
>     popped up.
> 
> Can anyone figure out why these two cases uses different values for
> do_timer?  They also use different values for down_on_keypress.
> cthose arguments are clearly there so that the two callers could treat
> these differently.  There must have been a reason.

I can't say why the do_timer argument is different, the modification was made 
by you almost 2 years ago:
2002-12-21  Richard M. Stallman  <rms@gnu.org>

	* xmenu.c (popup_get_selection): Now static.  New arg DO_TIMERS.
	If it is non-nil, run timers.  Use an unwind-protect to requeue
	the events that were read ahead.
	(popup_get_selection_unwind): New subroutine.
	(popup_get_selection_queue): File-scope variable now holds that queue.
	(xmenu_show): Pass 0 for DO_TIMERS to popup_get_selection.
	(xdialog_show): Pass 1 for DO_TIMERS to popup_get_selection.
	Use an unwind-protect to pop down the dialog box.
	(xdialog_show_unwind): New subroutine implements that.

I can speculate that since popup menus does a grab and dialog does not, there 
might have been some difference in event handling.

The reason for the difference in down_on_keypress is that when a popup menu is 
up, the keyboard is grabbed, so no keypresses goes to the Emacs frame anyway. 
But for a dialog there might be events that goes to the Emacs frame (for 
example if you have focus-follows-mouse and the focus is not on the dialog, but 
on the frame).  For such events the dialog is popped down (as per the old 
behaviour from previous Emacs versions).

> 
>     I guess we just have to get rid of the call to timer_check in
>     popup_get_selection.
> 
> I guess we do.  Will this mean that the cursor doesn't blink?
> If so, it would be good to make sure that the cursor is ON
> rather than off.

Yes, it means that the cursor does not blink for popup menus or dialogs.  This 
is the same as for Emacs 21.2 (the oldest I have here).  The difference is that 
  in CVS Emacs the cursor turns hollow when a dialog or menu is popped up, 
previously it stayed solid.

	Jan D.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-01  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-13  1:15 alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2004-10-13 14:43 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-14  5:16   ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2004-10-17  9:36     ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2004-10-25 13:13       ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-25 14:38         ` Jan D.
2004-10-27 10:47           ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-28 18:02             ` Jan D.
2004-10-29  1:37               ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2004-10-29  7:00                 ` Jan D.
2004-10-29  8:24                   ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2004-11-01  7:24                   ` Richard Stallman
2004-11-01  9:06                     ` Jan D. [this message]
2004-11-01 12:21                       ` Jan D.
2004-11-02 14:08                       ` Richard Stallman
2004-11-02 21:56                         ` Jan D.
2004-11-03 17:04                           ` Richard Stallman
2004-11-03 17:26                             ` Jan D.
2004-11-04 20:42                               ` Richard Stallman
2004-11-04 22:41                             ` Jan D.
2004-11-05 12:36                               ` Kim F. Storm
2004-11-06  5:22                                 ` Richard Stallman
2004-11-04 13:02                         ` Jan D.
2004-10-31  9:42               ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-31 15:11                 ` Jan D.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4185FC85.70100@swipnet.se \
    --to=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).