From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:11:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4185009D.5010405@swipnet.se> References: <7E7ABFB6-2693-11D9-9BC4-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> <41813425.2010001@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099235533 12716 80.91.229.6 (31 Oct 2004 15:12:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 31 16:12:05 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1COHNF-00030N-00 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:12:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COHVC-00058s-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1COHV2-00058h-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1COHV1-000582-4W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COHV0-00057n-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.73] (helo=mxfep02.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1COHN1-0007xb-BS; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([83.226.180.220] [83.226.180.220]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20041031151149.VGIK44.mxfep02.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:11:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040916 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29227 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29227 Richard Stallman wrote: > The BLOCK/UNBLOCK_INPUT is needed for the GTK version. This was discussed here > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2004-05/msg00155.html > > The solution proposed was to do as the menu code does, first build the > structures from Lisp code, then update the GUI. Only the second stage needs to > block input. Unfortunately this has not been done yet (on my todo list). > > So the cause is a real bug, albeit not one unknown. > > When do you think you'll be able to do make this change? > We need it before the release. (I will add it to FOR-RELEASE.) I've checked in the change. Jan D.