From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Guy Gascoigne-Piggford Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:58:38 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <417C339E.8080406@wyrdrune.com> References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <00d901c4b900$9b774500$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098658756 32420 80.91.229.6 (24 Oct 2004 22:59:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Emacs Devel , "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 00:59:11 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLrKQ-0002Ap-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:59:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrS3-00044x-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrRe-0003xc-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrRc-0003wQ-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:06:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrRb-0003vN-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.148.227.85] (helo=rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CLrJt-0005Kl-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from wyrdrune (c-24-21-205-248.client.comcast.net[24.21.205.248]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20041024225833014004r0phe>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:58:36 +0000 Original-Received: from 127.0.0.1 by wyrdrune ([127.0.0.1] running VPOP3) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:58:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Stefan In-Reply-To: X-Server: VPOP3 V1.5.0g - Registered X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28866 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28866 Actually I think that it's the other way around. The first server is listening and so the second can't bind to the port and so errors out. Guy Stefan wrote: >>There is a problem if you start the server in .emacs; does the first >>or second instance run the server ? I don't know if there is a >>generic answer to that question. >> >> > >The current code just overwrites any previous server, so the last instance >is the one that wins. > > > Stefan >. > > >