From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with Gnus Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:34:51 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <41782B7B.10305@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098394593 26683 80.91.229.6 (21 Oct 2004 21:36:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kevin Greiner , "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 21 23:36:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKkbb-0002KO-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:36:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKkj4-0001oo-BU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKkiv-0001od-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CKkiv-0001oE-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKkiu-0001oB-TO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:43:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CKkb5-0003Yy-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-195-137-77-250.freedom2surf.net [195.137.77.250]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9LLZ5nF001982; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:35:06 +0100 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.28] (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2942DDDD16; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:35:04 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Reiner Steib In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28711 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28711 >Kevin has synched some agent-related bugfixes from the trunk to the >v5-10 branch. It seems he forgot to install `legacy-gnus-agent.el' in >the v5-10 branch. > > > It seems to me he synched too much, since there is code there now to upgrade the gnus files to a future version. But Kevin will know what he intended. >In order to minimize the inconvenience, I think it's best if I "cvs >add legacy-gnus-agent.el" in Emacs soon (instead of fixing it in >Gnus/v5-10 and waiting for the semi-automatic syncing). I have to >leave now, but I can do it in a couple of hours unless someone has a >better suggestion. > > Is that really a sensible thing to do? Now people will have their gnus files upgraded to No Gnus 0.2 even though they are using 5.11. Will this cause problems? Is there a way to undo this if it does? I'd prefer to hear from Kevin about what he really intended before we do anything that might mess things up even more.