From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any chance of a `flatten-list' to merge 4 current versions? Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:00:53 -0600 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <40EAF6E5.5000207@yahoo.com> References: <16613.17204.80743.770959@bushmills.inf.ed.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089140879 12159 80.91.224.253 (6 Jul 2004 19:07:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 06 21:07:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BhvCI-0004zx-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:01:42 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BhvCH-0007yT-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:01:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BhvEJ-00038w-PZ for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BhvE6-00038O-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BhvE5-000384-QW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BhvE5-000381-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BhvBZ-0008E6-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:00:57 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BhvBX-0000xq-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:00:55 +0200 Original-Received: from 170.207.1.200 ([170.207.1.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:00:55 +0200 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 170.207.1.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:00:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 170.207.1.200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020406 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25500 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25500 Richard Stallman wrote: > Just 4 is not enough, but if there are a few more, then we would > want to put it in Emacs. To the extent there is duplication between 4 packages, that is unfortunate. Not correcting it could lead to more duplication, which would be more unfortunate. Sound familiar? :-) -- Kevin Rodgers