unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Re: Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el
       [not found] ` <87pt86il0w.fsf@orebokech.com>
@ 2004-06-11  9:16   ` Lars Hansen
  2004-06-11 18:26     ` Romain Francoise
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Hansen @ 2004-06-11  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw
  Cc: emacs-devel

Romain Francoise wrote:

>>! (define-key dired-mode-map "\M-O" 'dired-mark-omitted)
>>
>
>Don't do this: it fucks up the arrow keys in my console Emacs.
>
Ok. Can you, or anyone else, suggest a better binding?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el
  2004-06-11  9:16   ` Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el Lars Hansen
@ 2004-06-11 18:26     ` Romain Francoise
  2004-06-11 20:22       ` Lars Hansen
  2004-06-13 13:41       ` Lars Hansen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Romain Francoise @ 2004-06-11 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw


Lars Hansen <larsh@math.ku.dk> writes:

> Ok. Can you, or anyone else, suggest a better binding?

What about `* O'?

-- 
Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> | And you never lay down and
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | you never stay home...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el
  2004-06-11 18:26     ` Romain Francoise
@ 2004-06-11 20:22       ` Lars Hansen
  2004-06-11 21:45         ` Romain Francoise
  2004-06-13 13:41       ` Lars Hansen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Hansen @ 2004-06-11 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  Cc: emacs-devel

Romain Francoise wrote:
> 
> What about `* O'?
> 
Why not `* o' then? It goes better with M-o, I think.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el
  2004-06-11 20:22       ` Lars Hansen
@ 2004-06-11 21:45         ` Romain Francoise
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Romain Francoise @ 2004-06-11 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw


Lars Hansen <larsh@math.ku.dk> writes:

> Why not `* o' then? It goes better with M-o, I think.

We might want to use it in the future for "mark other" or some other
more often used operation.  "Mark omitted" doesn't appear to be that
useful, in my not so humble opinion.

What does the Dired maintainer think about it?

-- 
Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> | I get secrets at night, but
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | they don't stay. I get
                                        | secrets at night, but they go
                                        | away.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el
  2004-06-11 18:26     ` Romain Francoise
  2004-06-11 20:22       ` Lars Hansen
@ 2004-06-13 13:41       ` Lars Hansen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Hansen @ 2004-06-13 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw
  Cc: emacs-devel

Romain Francoise wrote:

>What about `* O'?
>  
>
Done.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-13 13:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <E1BWfMp-0007iJ-7U@lists.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <87pt86il0w.fsf@orebokech.com>
2004-06-11  9:16   ` Changes to emacs/lisp/dired-x.el Lars Hansen
2004-06-11 18:26     ` Romain Francoise
2004-06-11 20:22       ` Lars Hansen
2004-06-11 21:45         ` Romain Francoise
2004-06-13 13:41       ` Lars Hansen

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).