From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: miles@gnu.org, handa@etl.go.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?]
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 22:44:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4098-Tue26Feb2002224400+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200202262013.g1QKDo516704@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:13:50 -0700 (MST))
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:13:50 -0700 (MST)
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
>
> It might be okay to do that inside revert-buffer, but even then I'd
> suggest to do it only for the EOL format, not for the base of the coding
> system, to keep the possible unintended consequences to a minimum.
>
> Why not do it for both aspects of the coding system, in revert?
In principle, the two should go together, but in practice, the EOL
issue is much more simple and has less complications. So risky
decisions run lower risk with EOLs.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 7:01 [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 7:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 10:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-25 11:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 14:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-25 7:25 ` Miles Bader
2002-02-25 9:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:44 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-02-26 22:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 15:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-28 4:08 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 10:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25 11:58 Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-23 20:19 Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4098-Tue26Feb2002224400+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).