From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:35:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4079484d-991c-4319-8e45-5eb887bcbc1b@yandex.ru> References: <20170202202418.GA2505@acm> <83lgtouxpf.fsf@gnu.org> <20170202215154.GB2505@acm> <83h94bvhzw.fsf@gnu.org> <20170205220045.GB2294@acm> <83d1es61li.fsf@gnu.org> <20170211232511.GA13712@acm> <20170212120553.GB3087@acm> <5dac24ba-a73e-b4f4-f595-30f86564b00a@yandex.ru> <20170212172900.GC3087@acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486931759 29458 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2017 20:35:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:35:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 21:35:54 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd0sE-00076u-CB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:35:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd0sG-0005Pl-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:35:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd0rc-0005Pe-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd0rZ-0003EC-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:35:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]:33623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd0rY-0003E4-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id v77so15837190wmv.0 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:35:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xX+DBPD2vhK9xr6Tba1+TSdP/658B/dJt90nAhCd2ZY=; b=S1Aj1Fx5iAJ+0uKBidmVMFCNUCRFVFdQrV4aurT0k/tBqrMqoV1xO9eNkq7g1iuvfe RRJKVL+sws1Eip6EszbjvLXoXagVNISkq5MC0HuNM1gAMxGzGXXDo5a5m8cDdrbiZYO1 i5+x/KuOM3AEV3N7xhCzEasEVIOSJhKOf+RWcNt6BpQxx/X/U1Y+5Yaf0pu9haTQZCWu 0YLuFEUSdR2WQbW7BZ4zvClO6+TCDUuve0USwpEzBVMIEDQFeONlVMJj88gKo/p1q1ev ErvqpCVV+vYtFTpiKbkK5w17Lt5LHo68BWD4SglV2ecw8XQ7umtwvTZD3Ka3ffTJ8fh2 wbjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xX+DBPD2vhK9xr6Tba1+TSdP/658B/dJt90nAhCd2ZY=; b=ZdZYcH8QQKrl34qFf+8HDGcuA9NR5ezTJee4VheXeToQo6WBQWdgJIbT8l3lqzvLj3 qOwPM0k51tfcbeJLlpvBgLYlLE7ON9DCrzuoKULJEYAkMh5xqTYsd0KuM8m9tq/hyHDo 37qE1ss/8FJPhoYCet/osWop/GxBlh4T3V9gyPHrYLd9PAITJNz0YzjJvYDz4RwlIQ8P 4lEMY6SLvpxSn3e3949oFZK0lDyybWtXgFNwYzObaFcfTaP4xHWrkeyA0uHQYdG6JONX 6n7PnxB553EVzwaqbIFdvvG4ZB2pqPb/lHNPsEHCIbpAYuFpjFx282nK27GDQRfUSqeh JLZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mOVdiZqbI84IAPfeA0kSbhel/b1qyb2oxbD6ubusKWQuL/PacJpWTHQwUkZ/tdEg== X-Received: by 10.28.183.5 with SMTP id h5mr34709419wmf.39.1486931711725; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:35:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.41]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o22sm11174735wro.2.2017.02.12.12.35.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:35:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170212172900.GC3087@acm> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::241 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212306 Archived-At: On 12.02.2017 19:29, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > comment-cache and syntax-ppss are independent of each other No, they are not. forward-comment and syntax-ppss are and will be used from the same codebases. >> In the meantime, however, we need to keep Emacs compatible with >> multiple-major-mode modes some other way. > > See above. I'm not seeing anything "above" that satisfies the condition of "in the meantime". There's no patch for the islands feature proposed, but you want us to accept the comment-cache now-ish.