From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joachim Nilsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:30:35 +0100 Organization: vmlinux:~/ Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <4065AC2B.5080906@vmlinux.org> References: <861xnhfee8.fsf@avet.kvota.net> <86brmldvbd.fsf@avet.kvota.net> <86lllpc9sl.fsf@avet.kvota.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080435173 1833 80.91.224.253 (28 Mar 2004 00:52:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 01:52:45 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7OXd-0008B5-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:52:45 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7OXd-0008DE-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:52:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7Nly-0006D1-1h for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:03:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B7NlE-00067x-7W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:02:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B7NIi-0000km-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1B7Mxd-0005cn-On; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 18:11:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [193.41.214.66] (helo=vmlinux.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7Gie-0005Iq-EH; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from crash.vmlinux.org ([213.214.225.58] helo=vmlinux.org ident=crash) by vmlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7Ghf-0000P1-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:30:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20997 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20997 On 03/27/04 06:52, Richard Stallman wrote: > I don't think key bindings are needed for M-x compile. One doesn't > type it all that often. With all due respect to all your years of hacking, but that is a use-case question. Remainder of this followup concerns bindings in C-mode. I was spoon-fed C on Borland-C 2.0 IDE, so I have compile bound to C-F9 (plus many other neat bindings from that IDE), and I hit that sequence too much every day. Much thanks to gcc not being able to bail out in time and giving me followup errors to something early in a file and partly also due to not having a neat bindings for next/prev-error. The strongest point, however, to me using compile this often is simple laziness. I know I have a crazy quick CPU and the sloppiness in my style often suggest I've missed semicolons and other stuff. So I (and many more dumb-nuts like me) rather fix one error at a time and then recompile. Actually, this "technique" is often taught to us in school with the words; "Aw, don't trust that compiler output, it is probably something else -- fix the first one and rebuild instead". I know, "then we should fix the compiler" ... Fwiw, I'd like it very much to have C-c C-c (or C-c C-f, like in LaTeX-mode) be bound to compile (for the current major mode). Regards /Joachim