Kenichi Handa wrote:
> In article <3FFED268.3020908@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>, Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg> writes:
> 
>>Just copy&paste in both directions works fine.  But how can I be sure 
>>that the text is encoded with microsoft-cp1251, not with iso10646-1? 
>>What program would show the difference?
> 
> 

> If (encode-coding-string CYRILLIC_STRING
> 'ctext-with-extensions) produces a string that contains
> "microsoft-cp1251", it means that Emacs is using
> microsoft-cp1251 extended seqement in X selection.  And if
> copy&paste works fine, that means that the encoding is in a
> correct format.

I tested with encode-coding-string and all is OK.

> Hmmm strange.  What is the result of this?
> 
> (x-resolve-font-name "*-microsoft-cp1251")

We can exchange mails this way for another month, so I decided to dive 
into the Source ;-)  It seems override-fontspec hasn't enough 
"priority".  To see what I mean, take a look at the attached patch. 
After applying it,  microsoft-cp1251 is used in rendering.

Regards,
ogi