From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110582: Fix wording of error message in staticpro. Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:39:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3slif3qzvf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <5080564C.5090309@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350592744 6944 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2012 20:39:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:39:04 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 18 22:39:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TOws3-0000ol-FE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:39:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOwrw-0008Dd-Cd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOwru-0008DY-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOwrt-0003fT-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:33840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOwrt-0003fO-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOwrs-0004iS-Ma; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:39:00 -0400 X-Spook: Adriatic LLNL security STARLAN tempest mania Forte X-Ran: zVC(+.E|,#)B%.IQq?Sid4&xo5mNzg~iA(ORh?x~6blvm-w_~.WdH0=+DV~x-Z{?"K.z4v X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <5080564C.5090309@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:19:40 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154425 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione wrote: > Actually, I don't like either version of that message. I think "increasing" > binds more easily to "Emacs" than to "NSTATICS", leading to confusion. What > about "NSTATICS too small; increase it and recompile EMACS."? IMO, the second clause should be absent altogether, or say "please make a bug report". As with puresize, this is not something users should be changing.