From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp` Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:00:29 -0600 Message-ID: <3fbf532f-9e79-40ea-aff0-172af5ca8f20@alphapapa.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4320"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 26 01:01:32 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rT9f1-0000vo-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:01:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rT9e8-00072x-FS; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:00:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rT9e7-00072a-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:00:35 -0500 Original-Received: from shrimp.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.223.164]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rT9e5-0003ad-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:00:34 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|adam@alphapapa.net Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD9E42BCE; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a314.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8F9C42C76; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:00:30 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1706227230; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=7/5fiIM9DrN/hBtwLkoTYMigPSxcyZyjA1JdfYF0EAXBtTTG286nrZc6KdI6K4nHgTt7qG EuUEnVp4Y73CAv6fpXNQEFZ8uqYl2SZcpHDAsNxnVSEiyVaxbbPsO/+rAyh6CeBxfHnuuk okxMnCdOXpfUZ1vGj8yACprcCSFCoP4mCdZN6wutrCo/evNgmIGL3WXSHiGv/z6dPQtt4m UKEZ8Gp/BHSJ3WkN/osBot3LxX1gJL+Z2EnuDtdt9PMcTzs2pfmI1rIrwsxK9iQPZ1ei2+ 4/FdGWKYjtf0opDz3YRmikqCOdsgtJINVD9mGvF4s2Ep8JN4/Pv3cIk1rvsA6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1706227230; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=nqJWfL9Z/QaiJoJFmFlycEX5HgB2/HvLi6MYAWiupS8=; b=cOBBcPpK2sPCHqceB3sVrv8GpAwB8/tG8euEOeDIlx6YPegaPPMIqvR+HO62suO2u7eXhW wW/5Vj31OchAe56SiZ9LAiieDTemIATFxDugzj12qplzR5mKm74uQzjwn6XC8q5dHyZtEw GbfJj3iqnp9X9tGiBTHooGrlCbTjc5AC7jus41Q5BffJ+EJwj4OTjkDiR6kWi1r0CYXwtB QOArs9oHGmPeOs4mgv4AAQVD5ELlqqd6jyW6OlssX6JozdWxQ0Y5cm+Sfm/G/kIR23mJYU dtLfR0QCd0FoxZXGPvZLLmij+6eCMuXNd3i6o3Tx/iJOWcIFTSBMtttX4E+pOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-6fdd97fffb-p595b; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=adam@alphapapa.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|adam@alphapapa.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|adam@alphapapa.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Befitting-Fumbling: 52d8dd7e6d065089_1706227230985_3753686670 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1706227230985:4031876600 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1706227230984 Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a314.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.120.121.224 (trex/6.9.2); Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:00:30 +0000 Original-Received: from [10.66.1.218] (unknown [91.193.232.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: adam@alphapapa.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a314.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4TLdB61nfJzJp; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:00:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alphapapa.net; s=dreamhost; t=1706227230; bh=nqJWfL9Z/QaiJoJFmFlycEX5HgB2/HvLi6MYAWiupS8=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MonlnRAkcmlbkpTkfNsjY81xsG0AW4skDCRCL2B8Pim0dWLmwU6qwGOCByQaBhkSw zk/PMIW0lu6sxocQTY0u/kuS6vtqX6SA0ZqKwxte/3acz/7hpX7yuVGOgT1dHOBIV3 hyyuJB9LuDCEwRgT3cHya0uyTlQEm6hH4JOtI6/TWsbnhKqppNnQxUcGPxybGrhbYU h2BBN3Sl+A382iJTmMc59GJIK+DsiSyDCgwFS5utbVwdwAUOXEycwxg6kP566onRSA K5Bhb2BspLxBi0z6Kj/OHXxxXAd6PQVFmYZ/m9cH7zaUI8PZG/7dtUNRrJ+d290oy7 Vjde7m5uwuhLA== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: neutral client-ip=23.83.223.164; envelope-from=adam@alphapapa.net; helo=shrimp.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315396 Archived-At: Hi Stefan, > It's got several rough edges (most importantly that > `byte-code-function-p` returns non-nil for interpreted function values), > but it seems to work OK so far. Forgive me if this is noise (i.e. if that is already intended to be fixed): If that were not fixed, it would break a few things in non-core packages that I'm aware of. Other than that, and offering no opinion on the patch itself, I'm certainly in favor of the intent. :) Thanks, Adam