From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Releasing Emacs 26.1 Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 23:10:57 +1200 Message-ID: <3e95f4268aef910f3d18165a737ff8d2@webmail.orcon.net.nz> References: <83o9hsr28g.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgcvncp9.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1525691389 32446 195.159.176.226 (7 May 2018 11:09:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 11:09:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Orcon Webmail Cc: Eli Zaretskii , John Wiegley , Emacs-devel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 07 13:09:45 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFe1X-0008Ia-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:09:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFe3e-0001P5-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 07:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFe30-0001P0-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 07:11:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFe2z-0005ul-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 07:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-3.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.44]:43697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFe2r-0005jO-0b; Mon, 07 May 2018 07:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=51755 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-3.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFe2j-0001aO-OX; Mon, 07 May 2018 23:11:01 +1200 Original-Received: from [150.107.175.178] via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 07 May 2018 23:10:57 +1200 In-Reply-To: <87lgcvncp9.fsf@gmx.de> X-Sender: psainty@orcon.net.nz X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 60.234.4.44 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225105 Archived-At: On 2018-05-07 19:32, Michael Albinus wrote: > Phil Sainty writes: >> #31355 is the only thing I'm involved in that I'd want to ensure >> was included as, while it's minor, it's a regression from 25. > > I don't see that this bug is a release stopper. In comparision, there > are more severe Tramp bugs I didn't commit to the release branch in > order to not destabilize it. They are waiting for Emacs 26.2. If the bugs are in new functionality, I wouldn't see any issue with leaving the improvements until the next release if necessary; but I would have thought known regressions to behaviour which was working properly in the previous stable release would be worth delaying the new release to fix, if necessary. I suppose I don't understand why there's any hurry to release 26.1. -Phil