From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: on helm substantial differences Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:56:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3cf9620e-aca6-4f70-9140-24edc4e6d3d9@default> References: <87wnymda5g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a6vhth3z.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh3h2fx9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rgtndph.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3c9e3ebc-1ff6-402e-8e87-cc9b5f19a1fc@default> <87wnykxtrx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40954"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, bugs@gnu.support, andreyk.mad@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ghe@sdf.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 18:10:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4Ug-000AZG-Tg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:10:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4Uf-0003qh-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4Hi-00008z-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:56:52 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:53866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf4He-0008LK-JT; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:56:49 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AHGtfXx164273; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:56:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=LpBBy93ENErxEq3jZXw5UTawLVKFxOQRdh0hxt0UfjA=; b=P89yfnbAVVeVLUp5HxfTbG+Xsqt2xEzlsbObaANK8ItXikDJODWVp2mHQ8mzT5PCaY+D SXJU5LjK/Py/8DoHuWjGlZsZ0ZjM2f2E/OiL3cD+IlcwKn/iV4NCvwSqPFrLe7OUukkJ yeyh0ckZm4BahVR8W0GfQLpY/pQ7JiO+LFiuioHu/9dZqyRThZusdE/YCZDpc6JjZv38 VEXCay+S0Nlf2I8JDmYEuU30ypE8G/ItcJeo1+aUxbtTkt5ybXTPfQBKWPT6hKcGrgEZ iazAV8NCAbQ4EiGlYdt2ozbz/ax25CMtnIbp8+F5y7uPmcXZm962L2FnIyx52KVxxACw 1w== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34t7vn3kcd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:56:36 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0AHGtTBE002681; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:56:35 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34ts0r5ev9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:56:35 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0012.oracle.com (abhmp0012.oracle.com [141.146.116.18]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0AHGuTTY009123; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:56:29 GMT In-Reply-To: <87wnykxtrx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5071.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9808 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=940 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011170121 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9808 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=959 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011170121 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/17 11:56:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259292 Archived-At: > >> > `rich' is a poor choice, IMO - it doesn't mean much. > >> > >> This is a reference to the package ivy-rich > > > > Might as well call it `enhanced', `special', `super', > > or `wonderful'. Does "rich" have a meaning that > > suggests something here other than "full" or "great"? >=20 > If you don't like "rich" do you think "wise" is better? No, not I. "Wise" doesn't tell me anything about it. Nor would "DWIM". Nor would "smart". Just one opinion. I agree with Eli that the name can better describe the thing. And I already said that, if no better name can be found, then `ivy-rich' would be OK, if "ivy-rich" is in fact what it's called outside vanilla Emacs and users can find a description by googling for "ivy rich" or "ivy-rich". > Whereas current completions are column-oriented, > completions in the proposed format are line-wise. Sorry, I don't know what it means for completions to be column-oriented or line-oriented. But if you're saying that that's the distinction, then sure, maybe a name that covers that would be appropriate.