From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More build times Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:50:47 +0000 Message-ID: <3b017bf844562da7711b@heytings.org> References: <87czexj5tg.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmiwj1st.fsf@gnus.org> <83y1xkakvs.fsf@gnu.org> <878rpkiyzc.fsf@gnus.org> <83tu88ai3k.fsf@gnu.org> <87iloohib0.fsf@gnus.org> <41BC0745-6795-4F6E-8990-CDB29B6A25C7@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UFA4QWiHxj" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9427"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 19:52:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6yKv-0002Ar-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 19:52:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6yKu-0002Wn-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6yJZ-00017Z-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:46014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6yJX-0003m9-Kq; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:50:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1656611447; bh=8NeqGVSIFwqRZmTdPD7udk2qZ+0VwjMRmVGBQeAvpxQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=z0bL8lK7O0ymVeylkMVO+1ex8xIkxKYpWkXcUtfdLIZZyRnL6t+RqFZIXWo3FORDB n16dZlnNG1Il6RNbU1FPKOMmUGAZtaq+uo8GkiACyYHwrz5sno5dqlZRpJCa12YFbK 2OL3AJ2H8NiUKWmeHfpByWrSxuilRTjjjZCcgUG1r+e0vDwLdRbv2GGe5a4N2YBa+z NP6I59ATXP+OOr9YAwAzGozutg1NrpHZDxM2V5pelSfeaJeWBPu/8yiIlPd5/tEygv veaayaZdfbq9Uey2oDYwS/Ftk3JRRZm8AefV05R3vbT972kWFEeiLWyz6PKOnGR0jh FW6sMk4ukE8bQ== In-Reply-To: <41BC0745-6795-4F6E-8990-CDB29B6A25C7@acm.org> Content-ID: <3b017bf844187f78509b@heytings.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291754 Archived-At: --UFA4QWiHxj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-ID: <3b017bf8441265b6362e@heytings.org> >> 1362a9fec4 improvement from 130s to 119s (8%) Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd Mak= e=20 >> lambda-lifting work again > > That just fixed a typo introduced a week or so before, which should=20 > cancel it out. > Indeed. The typo in which that typo was introduced was a350ae058c deterioration from 108s to 129s (19%) Stefan Monnier=20 * lisp/emacs-lisp/cconv.el: Improve line-nb=20 info of unused var warnings And I just checked that fixing that typo in that commit removes the 19%=20 slowdown. This answers one of Lars' questions: >> a350ae058c deterioration from 108s to 129s (19%) Stefan Monnier=20 >> * lisp/emacs-lisp/cconv.el: Improve line-nb= =20 >> info of unused var warnings > > Hm... is that something that can be improved (if that code is still=20 > there, that is)? > --UFA4QWiHxj--