From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general Subject: Re: cc-langs.el Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:49:39 -0600 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <3F4FA043.7080602@yahoo.com> References: <5bekzd29w7.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <5b7k547aov.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <5b1xv83wlr.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <5bfzjmgi2q.fsf@lister.roxen.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1062185595 20612 80.91.224.253 (29 Aug 2003 19:33:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 21:33:13 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19sozh-0007n0-00 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:33:13 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19sp7A-0008SO-00 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:40:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19sotm-0006Eh-J8 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19soaM-0001aW-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19soTX-0008SO-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19soJP-0006Lp-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19soJk-0005pQ-00 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 20:49:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19soJi-0005pC-00 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 20:49:50 +0200 Original-Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19soJ2-0002dU-00 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 20:49:08 +0200 Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020406 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16196 gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general:774 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16196 Richard Stallman wrote: > > To concretize the discussion, I think the following functions are > > generally useful and haven't got any direct counterparts in the > > current set: > > > > Sorry, that is far too much. > > For what reason? The work of updating the manual? > > I don't even want to think about that many different functions, sorry. Martin's list has 82 functions. In comparison, lisp/files.el defines 83 functions, lisp/simple.el defines 152 function, and src/*.c defines 1,058 (Lisp) functions. The Common Lisp functions have a well-specified interface, and adding new functions (vs. modifying existing functions) should not affect Emacs' behavior. What's to think about? -- Kevin Rodgers