From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:07:33 +0100 Message-ID: <3F4A460A-BA40-4072-87E2-A91407820F9B@swipnet.se> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> <2FB562E4-0EA0-456E-9819-A11D9C6CD069@gmail.com> <83k2y5px67.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427263688 22418 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2015 06:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: chad , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 25 07:07:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaeTq-0007aa-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:07:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaeTp-0007rs-JG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaeTd-0007rm-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaeTc-0002uR-My for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailfe02.swip.net ([212.247.154.33]:53553 helo=swip.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaeTX-0002sc-My; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 02:07:35 -0400 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 583840981; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 07:07:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83k2y5px67.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.247.154.33 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184197 Archived-At: Hi. > 25 mar 2015 kl. 04:34 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >=20 >> From: chad >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:52:24 -0700 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On 24 Mar 2015, at 12:15, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>=20 >>> A related question is: does "C-x v v" at all make sense with Git and >>> other dVCSes? If it does, what would be the DWIM cycle there? = E.g., >>> would it make sense for "C-x v v" to push when the previous action = was >>> commit and there are not uncommitted changes? >>=20 >> Would a question like =E2=80=9CNo changes since your last commit; = push last commit?=E2=80=9D be good enough? >=20 > I think it's better to have a silent DWIM-ish operation, if we can > find one. >=20 It depends on who is the I in DWIM. For me, C-x v v already does DWIM, = I would hat it if that changed. Jan D.