From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mark H. David" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eglot manual suggestions Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:37:08 -0700 Message-ID: <39247e32-a0c5-43db-a4ba-7bc15e19b52d@app.fastmail.com> References: <87bkq1qkik.fsf@gmail.com> <83pmehp31g.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1t5p0lj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6602"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1047-g9e4af4ada4-fm-20221005.001-g9e4af4ad To: "Emacs Development" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 21:27:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1on378-0001Q5-8f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 21:27:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on2KP-0001AV-W1; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on2KO-0001AN-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from wnew4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1on2KM-0001Ue-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497C82B06704; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:37:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from imap47 ([10.202.2.97]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:37:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yv.org; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1666636649; x= 1666643849; bh=NOq2J5ROzSj/fedVInXp1kH5S2gzjT089LRekKaR00g=; b=Y tf5v0QvNxIQ67NdhzpcgwZjinxHEhvdpVz/70+jbWk0hY7VuCc0iuMZTVuyozEtN UIrgKapvwINhwaJlE7Bac8Unuqsv6x0o/PTQXEPfBzv3ayQoiRhLg4K1/+WexL6S 3dW1NFxa8KLBhZtFPd7vhdJOb5xHmOQFuujU0KQFQ3FPqLqJADNZhLZKRdI0AkVZ SIIL57tva2PkakewqsD8M0+aY5lo9d+KgwWS4bDmTV16CK2huBQ4Q71VEYsJ4wMr 731G02jrBqe1YUWCc4SB7M4vqiClKDYc/2AGhpZpTjVcBbDiqOEbVBLVhdbrk0PP 2i8aKoAuRYOi1guH6rBeg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1666636649; x=1666643849; bh=N Oq2J5ROzSj/fedVInXp1kH5S2gzjT089LRekKaR00g=; b=OAXkVWqdp4rQgY+NK DBaCLN623MPLtftEdi6qwCjqobB0FdTQmyL4vt60110bS2xNmz+n/TU7Q6nhfmi6 y8n3+9Dp2oUKd7vM9Qy4mR7NSbOi4o9jqk987LIkXC7vQjC7x2DbByQqHCyVLg/4 oThuxFyveZ8gHlwuzXxKoifQOB/xwnkZ6NJGDPLziolX/ifsn6a1dhhlRJG03Y+X cHtg1UFk+JLmW4LgRqhZNv0+nGv959Nlr7yC+JdnT/IkKxTSiikqq0NeuBYf7BXP orNSlhi+fvml1K4abMgC2hXoSqpuG0t+z5cIcvGiv4Z7+oybchWRnaKHp7428SXm +gHbQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrgedtgedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtgfesthhqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfo rghrkhcujfdrucffrghvihgufdcuoehmhhguseihvhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepteetuedtgffgvdehkefhgfdujedtueduieduuedttefhffehteelhffhleefhefg necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhhug eshihvrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i4ef241e8:Fastmail Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A011AA6007C; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:37:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface In-Reply-To: <87y1t5p0lj.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.18; envelope-from=mhd@yv.org; helo=wnew4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298410 Archived-At: Native English speaker and grammar nerd here. Wow, these are some intere= sting English fine points. FWIW, Robert is 100% right on with all these = changes IMHO. -mhd ----- Original message ----- From: Robert Pluim To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: eglot manual suggestions Date: Monday, October 24, 2022 10:56 AM >>>>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 20:03:23 +0300, Eli Zaretskii s= aid: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:00:35 +0200 >>=20 >> Normally, I=CA=BCd just commit this, but I feel the Grammar Drago= n has been >> poked enough for one week. I care not a whit if these are >> characterised as 'style changes' or 'grammar corrections', but I = feel >> they are improvements. Eli> In general, LGTM, thanks. However, ... >> -Eglot uses the Emacs's project management infrastructure to figu= re out >> +Eglot uses the Emacs project management infrastructure to figure= out Eli> Is "Emacs's" really wrong? "Emacs=CA=BCs" is not, but "the Emacs=CA=BCs" is. We can drop the "the" = and retain "Emacs=CA=BCs" if you prefer >> -This section provides a reference of the most commonly used Eglot >> +This section provides a reference for the most commonly used Egl= ot Eli> Is "reference of" incorrect? It=CA=BCs unusual. Here "reference" is used as "a list that you can refer to", which to me implies "for". But I=CA=BCm not wedded to it >> -To have Eglot stay away of some Emacs feature, add that feature's >> +To have Eglot stay away from some Emacs feature, add that featur= e's Eli> "Stay away of" is incorrect? Yes >> -If possible, we recommend to use these configuration files that = are >> +If possible, we recommend to use those configuration files that = are >> independent of Eglot and Emacs; they have the advantage that they= will >> work with other LSP clients as well. >>=20 >> If you do need to provide Emacs-specific configuration for a lang= uage >> -server, we recommend to define the appropriate value in the >> +server, we recommend defining the appropriate value in the Eli> Here, you contradict yourself: if "recommend to use" is OK, the= n why Eli> "recommend to define" isn't? That just means I missed the first one :-) Eli> And AFAIU, both forms are correct English. Possibly, but verb + gerund is more common and reads better. Eli> Also, why "those" in preference to "these"? Because we=CA=BCre referring to files that are not Emacs configuration files, hence "those" emphasises their otherness: "Don=CA=BCt use these, = use *those*" Robert --=20