From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Delete variables obsolete since Emacs 23 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38b4c392-0a02-4505-87df-74d29e872ee7@default> References: <20200515175844.18941.61355@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200515175845.997EC20999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20083fc0-59ca-444b-b18d-69e2f79d8c57@default> <14113880-109b-4315-8970-1100b248bd30@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8040"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 17 16:21:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k7g19-0001yo-O3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:21:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7g18-0003Pz-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:21:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7g0b-0002lw-BH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:36800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7g0Y-00041y-42; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07HEDCbF048320; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:21:01 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=HJ0JM8Nc4fE2ihq6SuPe2xFLVm5ffikwtmbxkFIRr6s=; b=CXcdIXPswYP5H8NxMYAP6UfpqtugBvBM1uW4sXj9wm8tnrvJKZcGLt/ORuvCOM+uPM6p 5jnVsyBoZDw2b1YGLTMrc2dHuiKHJF2/1PmMnDS5s+4bRp/P3V80xaPcScR3BosOm6vy 9r4Puu4XZkkdl4FBS34K6mPZKeDwjmlchlWsbX6E/kJhMYgCbT0egtOCr11xt42iaMJ1 I8uazIpM5PYn8tWzKzedZnBiZz8yaPNPwsylU58IqIzAoJPkbSHbfljiguU2lAbaX70r /xso4jkZnhSKOYgJbymSCWQpo6A73bIIG7T9g6D5aYimdVT4SijnH5y4eBLT1bJqS3B9 hg== Original-Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32x8bmy10v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:21:00 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 07HEDhRV131706; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:21:00 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 32xsm06m5h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:20:59 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 07HEKwK4000515; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:20:58 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5017.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9715 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008170109 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9715 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008170109 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/17 10:21:02 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253883 Archived-At: > I think we are miscommunicating. You seem to be talking about > called-interactively-p. I am talking about making your function take > an optional argument. What "your function" are you talking about? This is about the standard Emacs function `interactive-p'. What optional argument would you have it take, and why? And how would that solve the problem of existing calls to `(interactive-p)'? But yes, it does sound like we've perhaps miscommunicated. `interactive-p' has existed since nearly Day One. `called-interactively-p' was introduced to replace/"fix" it - presumably instead of fixing it directly by adding an optional arg and leaving the default behavior (no arg) as is. And `interactive-p' was declared obsolete. I have no problem with that declaration, even if I'd have preferred to see `interactive-p' fixed directly (previous paragraph). My only request is to not remove `interactive-p'. My request is to please leave it "obsolete".