Re: OS X: C-g does not break out of infinite loop

[Steven Tamm <steventamm@mac.com>]

On Jul 18, 2004, at 11:00 PM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:

> Hi,
> I thought I've explained that in the following message:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-04/msg01015.html
>
> Maybe your concern is another issue?  Anyway, I can test with Mac OS X
> 10.1.5 if you give me an example that may cause some problems.

I missed that explanation during my prolonged illness.  It makes sense, 
given the rewrite of sys_select (Due to the "why didn't i think of 
that" part of using ReceiveNextEvent with the timeout instead of 
unnecessary selects).

So I guess the only thing I need to keep reverifying after each OS 
release is the vfork problem.

>> However, I will check it in and let the 10.1 people complain because
>> the polling appears to work .
> Seems like the old patch is applied.  It may cause a hang because of
> lack of BLOCK_INPUT/UNBLOCK_INPUT for ReceiveNextEvent, which I
> mentioned in
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-05/msg00016.html
> Could you apply the attached patch over the current CVS?

Done.  I have noticed that responding to blocked subcommands still 
takes a second to respond, which seems odd since it should be 200ms.  
Have you noticed this as well?

-Steven