From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: contributing to Emacs Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 11:58:39 +0300 Message-ID: <3829b36259641b94f025cbaa6700b676ba5cc079.camel@yandex.ru> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8fnh1h2.fsf@web.de> <83mt0zs9rc.fsf@gnu.org> <0a968a4e1b267c0f15dd237e6ea12a709fc06d5e.camel@yandex.ru> <838rcisj7o.fsf@gnu.org> <6537fa5fa5c1fe8437ed99ee0988e35895f5a54b.camel@yandex.ru> <8423a35750d8d8e0437c7708f6b4d0bbdfdb7fe0.camel@yandex.ru> <6981052a75913ea435ae2adaccdaa1c66252a6df.camel@yandex.ru> <6a22f3608f37e238ffbd20d6dead86d3aa76d01e.camel@yandex.ru> <96766e99bf2618cc4290498933c6e32bc2a0f98a.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.2 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, arne_bab@web.de, luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 18 10:59:09 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qAoFZ-0000zL-9I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 10:59:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAoFE-0007dc-QT; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 04:58:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAoFC-0007cy-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 04:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from forward502b.mail.yandex.net ([178.154.239.146]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qAoFA-0005SJ-Q4; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 04:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-23.myt.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-23.myt.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:2929:0:640:5f6e:0]) by forward502b.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 55C4D5E8AF; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 11:58:40 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-23.myt.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id dwabrWNWxeA0-PAPuvS6W; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 11:58:40 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1687078720; bh=zfqVp4mhmLUOScN5p1A9QG0KtSbt3nD9DpY+M8plgOE=; h=References:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; b=rNtA3dFT080qEMZwBxHZFOaawzakZ13PknSl9XCQUAeulHu8QFGwFCHmmLPqc0En5 NNjHtShdRkbopkRJdb4NeGcdnPr1wLD0gpZDEtChPzIkCIjCSghe/EKu/61yosmaBN QOkeBf41vRxeT2lgQ5IM0jDl7WFr5sRcKKI7TxDc= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-23.myt.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.154.239.146; envelope-from=hi-angel@yandex.ru; helo=forward502b.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306923 Archived-At: On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 04:34 -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > =C2=A0=C2=A0 Okay, as mentioned elsewhere in thread, I think the problem = is > =C2=A0=C2=A0 known and further discussion here ain't productive. So I'm g= oing to > =C2=A0=C2=A0 stop here. But to answer something quickly verifiable: >=20 > Several people agree that contributing to Emacs is trivial, to the > point that you do not need to read _anything_ to make a contriubution, > even a significant one.=C2=A0 So what problem exactly is known? >=20 > =C2=A0=C2=A0 > Your message was quite far larger than both documents toge= ther > =C2=A0=C2=A0 > ... consider that for a second.=C2=A0=20 >=20 > =C2=A0=C2=A0 No. I measured specifically for you: "Sending Patches" alone= is 5884 > characters > =C2=A0=C2=A0 not counting bullets, and my email was 3491 characters. >=20 > Exaggerated claims, get overblown responses.=C2=A0 *shurg* My claims are easily verifiable and correct. Your claim wasn't correct. But I don't know what you're getting at here, because even if my claims wer= e exaggerated, replying them with a lie (because as I understand your last sentence it wasn't a mistake, you actually okay with it being wrong just be= cause you think my claims are exaggerated) is non-technical at best. I don't see = much point in further discussion with you, thanks.