From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Poll: Change xref-show-definitions-function's default? Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:16:42 +0200 Message-ID: <38027208-cc57-d0b9-c530-279b70557327@yandex.ru> References: <9af40a30-8964-3142-aadf-6592605720ec@yandex.ru> <87a6trjbat.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28796"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: emacs-devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Mart=c3=adn?= To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 12:17:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwNrW-0007Og-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 12:17:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36600 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwNrV-00065w-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:17:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwNqy-0005gU-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:16:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]:41073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwNqw-0001xu-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 06:16:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id ce23so36289545ejb.8 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:16:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YsAuQB8q1w6I/M0RW2b8iA81/eThvHNlQw2N/YNxQWM=; b=TLanZd+hyympIlNnsZ6oKuanxHkrDmXfrXxr7xeQriyw5c2NrfOitfKbrHuYNlLGLb cx50epaVDQ6XT7UO4S9IfLuKxx7NSzcqmTJZovzqIfn1qRtGTKYbpbiBczojz2h0sOYI F0vGqucgqwwXg0oIHvekh0rJENSDQg2S4FwYQhfgqD2fZeIDIwOTTNrlI6dUwfryeGcV bxeMjbivUvTV6f+0+VEYlPFH18iN9fHBMDJkz+6bRsK2bJd0Y95YhKnkotg2U1NRf1pI GhZrXmySsDHpzE/wQdFlfbqDxVBbxAjt0R0LJIqoObvi0WOghxwI+6HIAWVWjX6mz50B 6K8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YsAuQB8q1w6I/M0RW2b8iA81/eThvHNlQw2N/YNxQWM=; b=SYIhoMGfTKSqbUdP9FrhniGi993Y9QFfBm0LrehGFNv4+3YKBKpGzww15WSnSw6Cab XJzQElZRQRC6TB+EsJ4DcDVzHqxW7wUW5ZpjtbfPAXyEhD1QYGiSBTxS5WKiJKXE0r3v NN947xlYGOsG8i+f53GBkkIiJZoKHh2D7Mt1AEgE1cvPNc678Jb+wmlZ7SWD68J4VuId zzUXSPO8v4jluoQdphIvBOgguXXZownD8TeXV94/T8BoKssg8QjSHyHk1yS8nDs5AhYT ERw/fCRvFNeeqlf5/kYQuqafBxr0r13W8ygCyPMaAkXSYjzKCVn9ZlEzF0eLXLCHLCKC 5lWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531B8IFWktRTzv/pCvFz9CVpO9ulFnM+Xt0yIchPzR645DEsgOjn cq5HUmImfgOjw0bQ9Ix0AJZO2ync38prdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzUTfs/ro+x+0btMSw+/RQFOWZsWkgGBsY6islT+bDgmczfuRqEbg+Jyi69hSLRwAHR1kooA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:edd1:: with SMTP id sb17mr65247669ejb.118.1609759005354; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:16:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm23375084ejq.121.2021.01.04.03.16.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:16:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62d; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262413 Archived-At: On 04.01.2021 10:48, João Távora wrote: > Yes. In terms of UI, not code. That's fine. It just seemed you criticized only one of the alternatives, and yet dismissed both.