From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: chad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Service names on machines with bad service files Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:25:27 -0700 Message-ID: <38015A78-89EB-4C10-8BBF-84A33E639599@mit.edu> References: <87obyg9wr3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316465182 3902 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2011 20:46:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 19 22:46:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5kjA-0005be-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41771 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5kPF-0001Dc-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5kP6-0001DK-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5kOz-0004bP-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu ([18.7.68.35]:45860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5kOz-0004bL-Rr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:17 -0400 X-AuditID: 12074423-b7b31ae000000a3c-ff-4e77a52d437d Original-Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 81.82.02620.D25A77E4; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id p8JKPGsf004223; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.6] (c-67-183-32-38.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.183.32.38]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as yandros@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id p8JKPD2f006938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87obyg9wr3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprAKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6noqu7tNzPYNELVYvTMzpYLB4veMJq cWTdARYHZo+2aWYeB9uyPK5t6GQOYI7isklJzcksSy3St0vgytg7tY+tYD1LRdPK++wNjNuY uxg5OSQETCTO3p3CCmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgH6NEz5a77BDOBkaJS22nWSCcE0wSnevOsYG0 CAvYSiy98BCoioODV8BY4vU/JpAws4CWxI1/L5lAwmwCMkBTNUDCnAL6ErtmX2AHsVkEVCUm zl/MAlHuKLFo/RdmCFteYvvbOWA2r4CVxPHbHxhBbCGBIokz12aCHSoioCHx/+QiqKPlJRa3 fGacwCg4C+GIWUiOmIVk6gJG5lWMsim5Vbq5iZk5xanJusXJiXl5qUW6Znq5mSV6qSmlmxjB weyivIPxz0GlQ4wCHIxKPLwfF5f7CbEmlhVX5h5ilORgUhLl3QMS4kvKT6nMSCzOiC8qzUkt PsQowcGsJML7Ogsox5uSWFmVWpQPk5LmYFES55XZ6eAnJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk5Xh4FCS4C1a AtQoWJSanlqRlplTgpBm4uAEGc4DNDwbpIa3uCAxtzgzHSJ/itGY4/P0xhOMHHu3AUkhlrz8 vFQpcV5XkFIBkNKM0jy4abCE9IpRHOg5YYilPMBkBjfvFdAqJqBVZR4lIKtKEhFSUg2MG/Jv bH065ci01DVWMrNF4w4UKRjrH81UfZdRe+ub+N4MV62XVU3thz2f/rqhdSpD0mPnzGTBL+vD JF0eCTYsm+ZRzK+yg6n25r/K8o8uJzujUs5ICidZnD1778nR0xmqMnfkzJze7omY X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 18.7.68.35 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144105 Archived-At: On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Chong Yidong wrote: > > I'd rather use just 993. Doing (or (service-port-number "imaps") 993) > doesn't really make sense. OTOH, no one will ever change the service > names from their standard values, so the value will always be 993 > anyway. I've no idea if there's any need to do so anymore, but I've worked in systems (predating ssl) where we changed the service numbers in /etc/services. I imagine that it's rare, but if anyone cares, it seems like (defconst imaps-port 993) is cheap and easy. *Chad