From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>,
Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr>, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: RE: seq-some-p and nil
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 10:53:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3773e7a4-64c2-40e0-978d-a77a075a7776@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvfv2nbi7l.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
> seq-some already solves those problems. The user can provide a FUN that
> returns a cons if she so wishes. It's simple and general.
So is assembly language simple and general. Why make callers of
`seq-some' deal with the nil-value-vs-not-found issue and wrap
existing predicates they want to reuse with cruft, just to get
the desired effect? Why not just have `seq-some' DTRT, always?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 15:50 seq-some-p and nil Simen Heggestøyl
2015-09-03 16:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-03 17:19 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-09-03 17:35 ` John Mastro
2015-09-03 17:50 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-03 19:36 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-03 19:45 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-06 1:17 ` Mark Oteiza
2015-09-06 20:48 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-06 21:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-07 6:11 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-07 8:06 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-07 15:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-07 15:23 ` Mark Oteiza
2015-09-07 17:08 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-07 20:44 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-07 22:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-08 7:09 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 12:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-08 13:07 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 16:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-08 17:01 ` David Kastrup
2015-09-08 17:08 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-08 19:02 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 19:48 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-09 7:56 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-09 13:26 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-09 17:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-09 17:53 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2015-09-09 20:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-09 20:46 ` Drew Adams
2015-09-09 21:44 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 18:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-08 19:03 ` David Kastrup
2015-09-08 18:59 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 19:06 ` David Kastrup
2015-09-08 20:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-09 7:57 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 13:21 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-08 13:37 ` Mark Oteiza
2015-09-08 17:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-09-09 2:19 ` Mark Oteiza
2015-09-09 4:28 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-09-09 4:57 ` Mark Oteiza
2015-09-07 20:45 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-03 19:40 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-10 17:46 ` Simen Heggestøyl
2015-09-10 22:12 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-22 17:17 ` Simen Heggestøyl
2015-09-23 8:38 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-23 8:44 ` David Kastrup
2015-09-23 8:48 ` Simen Heggestøyl
2015-09-23 10:57 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-09-28 19:17 ` Nicolas Petton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3773e7a4-64c2-40e0-978d-a77a075a7776@default \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=mvoteiza@udel.edu \
--cc=nicolas@petton.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).