From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:36:38 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <3759-Wed23Apr2003113638+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <84r87ulpts.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <87u1cqy8jc.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <84d6jetmfg.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <87r87up9qi.fsf@nyaumo.jasonrumney.net> <873ck9x6qi.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k7dlogsp.fsf@nyaumo.jasonrumney.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051087722 27372 80.91.224.249 (23 Apr 2003 08:48:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 23 10:48:38 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 198Fvi-000776-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:48:38 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 198G1N-0000ba-00 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 10:54:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 198FpO-00082N-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:42:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 198Fp2-00080E-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 198Fnm-0007gn-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from bilbo.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.18]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 198FnC-0007CS-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretsky (cable-131-74.inter.net.il [213.8.131.74]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id AMR06150; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:39:43 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: jasonr@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <87k7dlogsp.fsf@nyaumo.jasonrumney.net> (message from Jason Rumney on 23 Apr 2003 07:43:02 +0100) Original-cc: ben@xemacs.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:13383 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:13383 > From: Jason Rumney > Date: 23 Apr 2003 07:43:02 +0100 > > A simple yes or no is sufficient, we are trying to determine whether > there is a simple explanation for XEmacs being noticeably faster than > GNU Emacs for network operations on Windows, or if it is due to a bug > in GNU Emacs. Another relevant piece of information is whether the Windows build of XEmacs is a native build or a Cygwin build.