From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sv: Emacs HTTP libraries [was: Re: How to contribute new package to GNU ELPA?] Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:53:21 -0400 Message-ID: <35cb99a0-4350-f100-0c23-d554e6548bcc@gmail.com> References: <87r1jxd3d8.fsf@gnu.org> <8e549f23-db75-2ef1-4399-0fb52e5efa6f@gnu.org> <87zgykn5qc.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg4ckbfw.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtukn463.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8f0kaoj.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtukk9b3.fsf@gnu.org> <2e968b98-2264-03e7-d0b2-5570c94b6fb7@gmail.com> <838s64k3xk.fsf@gnu.org> <8260671e-df0a-e471-79fb-82f80e11696a@gmail.com> <837dlok1zj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4921"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 21:54:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKR8-00018o-2r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:54:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKR7-0007W6-4F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKQY-00074a-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]:39574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKQW-0005UF-Ew; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id q26so17104257qkm.6; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:53:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXbwrpr8nOlhxxFjUdXU2jq5HsRWigqoRkFZz7iy/Bk=; b=JrkWU0a+LE39JPElwfWB43CcMyRWE2gzrBqcJ0Vx/XnkYT2VzOJ/7UbDtRN1pDqFMp AoR34WnmzVz4zKtC+jrpq6dIQDinr4stYd6O8zNvb774GOZmZAyJHgugTB5E8SKU86m7 kG6eGovbA6VdvBfkfC2kV0dSLi+Xlu4cZg5+RMC6zWSWbHVcMp/QhSiH8gRNKUYuh3rp mIssKV1IAN1e7dIkKx+B6rCp3QMKNsX03YV0UL9L3+jnan32a1EE4BC3S7k+dDWdCkEp 9PsVMKVEr0/JTwVlI96rq3OIiPQU2UdnCj7k4WslDlCDzir33wUlDhXBoHkSppIYMLxX sJew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXbwrpr8nOlhxxFjUdXU2jq5HsRWigqoRkFZz7iy/Bk=; b=P1xGHs74W1SeG6WoEZzutZf7Qj5Zd1m9eOvSXZ3ZYmq+8nEA+PRHR600Cu4z77QJYx AdEKMzFkrXxSlpYl79yEqv9Sqe6jTMrWFER6zcIBgzbZiwbZApbu3/Mpw5p8q0D4IO8s NC0b4y3kMTbcEihx19UETa+9jmr4ijsT6DhgvEDcTPfNBHlCQUzsanqTl0X3/2cXw+qD H6Oldr91twWVFfE9FFgX0wxuD7jI00EUhHqtzsnZ3JGexUYG20qzIeiDtKeGXuNXiNYR YBM5369LQz5mt/4vOZ1YujMsPuJKAfWlFCguFgORZ/FfBLDklmblnCddmmSBLyuOJGpo z8Ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/LfrTUs1TG4hPCYLPyUW5eBucPq11P8HSdyMDVzoRlV47TNbY U8X9S0a0ZYS6vQH4uwCMOmWcBZIla9I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1BDEoP8NzW586EpmBnLod1xFtuco/tzisr0vtLUdy/wu6lSf+NZqlZVpyaJQ5budJoxWXgA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2207:: with SMTP id m7mr13082417qkh.405.1617134002805; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-24-61-240-80.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.61.240.80]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z188sm16727488qkb.40.2021.03.30.12.53.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837dlok1zj.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a; envelope-from=cpitclaudel@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x72a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267194 Archived-At: On 3/30/21 1:03 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: Clément Pit-Claudel >> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:49:25 -0400 >> >> (let ((read-process-output-max (expt 2 22))) >> (benchmark-run 1 (url-retrieve-synchronously >> "https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/emacs-27.2.tar.xz"))) >> ⇒ (2.719771409 7 1.9299083920000157) >> >> Although, to be fair, I'm not sure what to make of these numbers. With the GC change only, for example, Emacs reports 1.45s after freezing for 7 to 8 seconds, not 1.45 — I guess that's because the GC runs after the benchmarking completes? > > Yes, that's what I'd expect. > > So it seems like Emacs networking is not so slow, at least in this > simple benchmark. Not if you turn off garbage collection, indeed (except for the fact that you pay for it later on), but wouldn't a native library remove that GC pressure?