From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:43:27 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <3405-Wed18Sep2002094325+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <20020904163125.510C.LEKTU@terra.es> <20020906123406.9D40.LEKTU@terra.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032331436 2944 127.0.0.1 (18 Sep 2002 06:43:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 06:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17rYZ0-0000lM-00 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 08:43:54 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17rZDC-00020K-00 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:25:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17rYZG-00023k-00; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 02:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17rYY8-00023C-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 02:43:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17rYY1-00022e-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 02:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from freya.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.14]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17rYY0-00022G-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 02:42:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BTN97141; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:42:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: lektu@terra.es X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <20020906123406.9D40.LEKTU@terra.es> (message from Juanma Barranquero on Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:47:53 +0200) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7978 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7978 > Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:47:53 +0200 > From: Juanma Barranquero > > > How about if you invoke command.com explicitly, like this: > > > > command.com /c for .... >>foo.txt > > I couldn't make it work, it didn't write any directory to subdirs.el. Does it work to have the ``for ...'' part be in a batch file which is then invoked as "command.com /c foo.bat ..foo.txt"? > BTW, would it be OK to install some of the lisp/makefile.w32-in changes > into 21_1_RC? That way the update-subdirs target would at least work in > NT/2K/XP platforms. (And the WINS/WINS_WITHOUT_TERM hack can be > installed if necessary to make it work also in 95/98/Me.) I'm not sure I know what changes you have in mind. Could you please post a diff?