From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: (elisp)Numbers
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:57:34 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <3405-Tue07Oct2003215733+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
References: <200310041536.h94FaKQ18903@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065557547 22959 80.91.224.253 (7 Oct 2003 20:12:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:12:27 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 07 22:12:25 2003
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A6yC1-0001Kh-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:12:25 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A6yC1-0002J2-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:12:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A6yAJ-0003wQ-VM
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:10:39 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A6yAF-0003wE-84
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:10:35 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1A6y9i-0003pw-B9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:10:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.15] (helo=balder.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A6y1i-0002Vj-Eh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 16:01:46 -0400
Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.148.47])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR)
	with ESMTP id CUY76381; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:01:28 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200310041536.h94FaKQ18903@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:36:20 -0500 (CDT))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions.  <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16987
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16987

> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:36:20 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
> 
> What do we do with (elisp)Numbers now that integers have 29 bits?  (On
> most machines.)  Should all examples in (elisp)Numbers be rewritten
> for 29 bits or not?

Yes, I think so.