From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:33:32 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <3405-Fri21Jun2002183331+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020611083341.2609I-100000@is> <87adppy67u.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024673777 28440 127.0.0.1 (21 Jun 2002 15:36:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:36:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ats@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17LQSP-0007Ob-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:36:17 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17LQuc-0008AW-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:05:27 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17LQSO-0003We-00; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:36:16 -0400
Original-Received: from balder.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.15])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17LQRs-0003V9-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:35:44 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA)
	with ESMTP id BNB41176;
	Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:35:32 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <87adppy67u.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob
	Browning on Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:45:41 -0500)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5059
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5059

> From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:45:41 -0500
> 
> what would be
> the most appropriate way to build the X and non-X binaries?  Should I
> just go through a full clean, reconfigure, and make for each one, or
> is there a more efficient approach that would still be considered
> correct.

I don't think there's a way except make distclean, configure (with
appropriate switches), then make.