From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs reproducible builds part1 of 2 : eln Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:22:15 +0200 Message-ID: <32f589fe-7c9f-4d0c-b058-f2bea843e5d5@lsmod.de> References: <8d01d73e-7ce1-4b3a-a25c-03b518a7e584@lsmod.de> <83jzofj70t.fsf@gnu.org> <83edemiklb.fsf@gnu.org> <7b8772f0-4c34-4f4a-a076-4805dd96fa2e@lsmod.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37465"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 31 10:23:17 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sCxXg-0009W1-5X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 10:23:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCxWt-0001aB-5e; Fri, 31 May 2024 04:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCxWn-0001ZZ-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 04:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.bmwiedemann.de ([188.40.142.18]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCxWl-0005Ju-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 04:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.bmwiedemann.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bmwiedemann.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBFF3FE6; Fri, 31 May 2024 08:22:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lsmod.de; s=202205; t=1717143736; bh=G8nrdAwFsVL5scC5IH+U4qSDvBgrQ2I3HWPVhlC/Y/w=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=oEolcrvJrkIjG70NA5mBz9QiTUiB4x/EiTdWpLzoxq7t72VChoo56Q+Af2tAq1mEQ N/19J592of94XsSxTCVSpQ1oLpmressC8yTDbI54M2opyWagyaT5Y321UTpNyecefA Wg5gEcdBA5HiqXWSFc3monbLjNm7JmdsDIwxniQb/x40oBL2S2RnE2pp/5r2q15WH8 BioBlGFP1DiDHw9FLt2OkXbVjI2g8u6D4AG8jUMnyAyoGPAx5NiNi1PfVMgm7i8JxF sojvaDZaR6ta6Mw/ClfNR4hRwoADcnFNE1CXJjdv/ASP9gHAA9zqLBCXOojG2aJ48a qZqK0PAqdZlqg== Original-Received: from [192.168.178.48] (unknown [10.8.5.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bmwiedemann.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 31 May 2024 08:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=188.40.142.18; envelope-from=bernhardout@lsmod.de; helo=mail.bmwiedemann.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319769 Archived-At: On 31/05/2024 09.44, Andrea Corallo wrote: > Ouch I'm not sure there will ever be a 29.4... Eli? A 30.0 release would also be fine, if it happens this year. > Bernhard trying master is not an option? not that easy. My test-tools expect a .spec file that builds rpms. When I try to use master and use an adapted 29.3 .spec file I get either autoreconf errors or using the (old?) configure No rule to make target '@STDBIT_H@', needed by 'fingerprint.o'. autoreconf errors were: autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --include=/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/emacs-29.3 --include=/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/emacs-29.3/m4 --force configure.ac:6405: warning: AM_LANGINFO_CODESET is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd configure.ac:6391: EMACS_PAPER_WIDTH is expanded from... configure.ac:6405: the top level configure.ac:7382: warning: gl_STDBIT_H is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd m4/gnulib-comp.m4:225: gl_INIT is expanded from... configure.ac:7382: the top level configure.ac:6392: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_LANGINFO_CODESET If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure:35948: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_STDBIT_H configure:36429: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_MUSL_LIBC configure:38427: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_PREREQ_READUTMP_H configure:41153: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_GETLINE configure:41165: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_PREREQ_GETLINE configure:42944: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_MEMSET_EXPLICIT configure:42956: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_PREREQ_MEMSET_EXPLICIT configure:44134: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_XATTR configure:47673: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_FUNC_GETDELIM configure:47685: error: possibly undefined macro: gl_PREREQ_GETDELIM autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.v5UOFL (%build) Ciao Bernhard M.