From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Paul W. Rankin" via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'M-o' ('facemap-keymap') has now been removed until March 10th 2021 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:38:07 +1000 Message-ID: <32A55BBD-1A3F-4EC4-817F-7C3408C22A65@bydasein.com> Reply-To: "Paul W. Rankin" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5529"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 23 22:47:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOosB-0001MD-GI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:47:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39760 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOosA-0004sQ-3I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:47:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOojW-0007cl-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:38:38 -0400 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:37084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOojU-0002XC-5C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:38:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=nc85+7eRGvw7WTH8sVfM6OOkLk9HafeOmf6gNqAv9yMZfwshmVf7J65JX7i36AeUC5tpSmc4ZxpVrKDaQqBQZKYxHu7plllWG3+VhAK2yqMrRA1kaXmWwoQnNjPbPNEbHQw3Aqd2RmVULZY6ZV2+9e6P3iLRfgITeu7QGodvO9zYXGYZTXRotNZNGD8ObV5k9L/jbFzY9hkSJQrzJQkoqCAPoXKEZ7f/vn4xwC1yXDQyDWGi6LhNAwgaK9AJhS//jhYJtSoA3db+tBG7fVeGW7XEu8c/KBlGhtNy6zoRmm5OnXLDqGtxi7TziaDgurUh2iOSw5lX6PVszw+pBeNZ+w==; s=purelymail1; d=bydasein.com; v=1; bh=wbLQOF/bul2L0ZsreScI0nQu+mpv6GScYqaSrjcZe0o=; h=Received:From:To; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=qb7ScC5DPKPDRA07lW+lcXnMW/pn6GokT+RyZM8nMr/zjsHRPU7q03T+CA4lxFRrdRO69GJq5qeOe1M5Ja8jdkPnALNYx1ImFBqolCmlqfAxQ6k5fgLLnXD3Wy1xseGAORvgSw0mfHnfQkvvwCON+a+maoODEC/6uh+eHr5/QNaQvVilHovJJ64jHlqtLSKtP9NTCOfKrW0ti6vzQ9FP1qbax7EMLdbGYDJCUwtT02KOPdnfUmsfh1blk5fBXfKBlJoEXSg2IeKe+QB3S8DkOEcCUu10Nlej7GVKtd/Ws7hN6gnfSTgeqfw9jPKB2UyILPQkueYTaON2sjfpUZHfFA==; s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=wbLQOF/bul2L0ZsreScI0nQu+mpv6GScYqaSrjcZe0o=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:From:To; Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by ip-172-30-0-124.ec2.internal (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID 38632903; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:38:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=pwr@bydasein.com; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:44:35 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266895 Archived-At: Unless I'm fundamentally missing something, the new command = font-lock-update only duplicates the functionality of existing command = font-lock-fontify-buffer, and adds some confusion... When font-lock-mode is active and font-lock-update is called with ARG, = the command unfontifies the buffer and deactivates font-lock-mode. Wut? = Makes no sense for a command called font-lock-update... The docstring states that font-lock-update only fontifies the accessible = portion of the buffer. This isn't true; the command calls = font-lock-fontify-region, which widens the restriction unless = font-lock-dont-widen is non-nil, which is nil by default. Given the removal of M-o M-o to fontify block, the addition of C-x x f = to update fontification is a good idea, but let's just have it call = font-lock-fontify-buffer and get rid of this command. If someone wants specifically to toggle font-lock-mode, they'd just call = M-x font-lock-mode. If they're toggling font-lock-mode enough for it to = become an issue, they'd bind that to a key.=