From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:25:44 +0000 Message-ID: <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 20:27:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKQyK-0009yT-3v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:27:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57026 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKQyJ-0002Jk-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:27:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKQwP-0008Kd-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:55806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKQwM-0001BR-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:25:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1615490744; bh=xnVRg6MsP7KDam+5cyGfIwr/xs5lKmdxLXWR9ZE4lNU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=ojIFByEK153AF07O18UxKOg8yLDEN50LOhFPkfnTZncJUee72rC8o3I2IZhuQfrL1 JxNcSPMkBtAWTPwNj8NYvyuhwGXUA0YAbcSkIBbJtiMpvwYCwWjLVHtQXu9vsNOyTO OXyg1M/9pXLCQxtaoM+xTfNyZEnIw8nQ6FeOn/k4jqa9OxmMv46jdyr4vmMsyALofJ zQfHLWOpMx70z/qEEzhuA7j6T0bRBwFw4fjFuk8irjW/XexV0AnH6805Y+4Jx36Uah ye12fX1RSVeoQAQTxEF7oyolm3au476XmXYWxcvV7coxg8luPr37Z0Za7RaRoH1mHO HdvOaLwdWNNdA== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266352 Archived-At: >>> Also, I suspect that for your use case, we could have a general >>> "refresh" command, which just calls `font-lock-flush`, which would not >>> depend on the ill-defined notion of "block" (and wouldn't mess with >>> the mark). >> >> Yes, I agree that a >> >> (defun font-lock-fontify-window () >> (interactive) >> (font-lock-flush (window-start) (window-end))) >> >> would probably be useful. > > It could even flush from point-min to point-max. > Is that not what font-lock-fontify-buffer already does (except during narrowing)?