From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Theodor Thornhill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:56:45 +0200 Message-ID: <30BD0CDB-17B9-45DB-A77D-DA57E8535032@thornhill.no> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83wno6p0op.fsf@gnu.org> <4FD0AA48-0E93-4E6A-BD65-C2E492322982@thornhill.no> <83zgt2ni07.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3842"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 09:57:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtDa-0000kh-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:57:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53874 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtDY-0003fS-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtD1-00030g-NQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from out0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:267::]:23849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtCy-00087U-3m; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:56:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thornhill.no; s=key1; t=1630137412; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oo7h0XcPD7XPr4PXF0EnTyzeQfwSOax1a6BTUBWcPm8=; b=eNHNLkk7zWVW4HyVWkvK6WJvf+AXlojsjJmLW/TAEM3UigfA0cq7jOX5BypTU9bqORApHM c3ZmrUeWYlYCOp5kzFe2+g/p9yaybkkIxdGQSON1QJ1EvjLTpCgvq9MNIsSDu/YWvEBoUH 0sZk+K+87r7gMq7Sw9Sxg7YPaIK5GfPTylv5ozxE1dSUrkvN93ijI9YEksH8SArwiEbxOh t5v35xnZWt3OcTAE9l+QSvqX+YShughJGZC7FdJXKj+HzV5sBRqDnIdlFf4oCEo+RJQwTL RkKGRKQvL0+InC0toMU+YVIKWJ4lFx3m8z7Zcqq/mvBXDjuRKOnpUTUU4rANGQ== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-Reply-To: <83zgt2ni07.fsf@gnu.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: theo@thornhill.no Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:267::; envelope-from=theo@thornhill.no; helo=out0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273244 Archived-At: On 28 August 2021 09:30:32 CEST, Eli Zaretskii < >The list of issues we filed with GitLab was mostly about email-based >workflow and other relevant features, because the Web-based workflow >was supported by GitLab already=2E It sounds like we now need to >augment that list by the requirements from the Web-based workflow, >since SourceHut and other platforms might lack them=2E > >Would someone like to come with a list of such requirements? Yeah, not sure what these requirements are, though, apart from the pr work= flow being recognizable across many GitHub derivatives=2E=20 The mailing of patches seems like the hardest issue to overcome from what = I see people complaining about=2E Prettier UI/UX is also on the list=2E One= can be learned, the other is subjective=2E I think the most important thin= g SourceHut solves is catering a little better to the one time contributing= workflow than what debbugs does=2E I'm really not sure what this list should look like Theo