From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephan Stahl" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should shell-quote-argument really use (eq system-type'windows-nt)? Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:37:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3093.83.171.153.46.1110656269.squirrel@wwws.franken.de> References: <47393.217.194.34.123.1110200368.squirrel@wwws.franken.de><003301c5231 d$9c2f3390$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110656431 24830 80.91.229.2 (12 Mar 2005 19:40:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stephan Stahl Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 20:40:30 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DACTG-0000dG-IW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:40:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DACia-0000XR-Mz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DAChm-00009B-45 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:55:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DAChj-00008J-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DAChj-00006a-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:55:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [193.175.24.27] (helo=ilsa.franken.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DACQp-0003DB-1a; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:37:51 -0500 Original-Received: from wwws.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) by ilsa.franken.de (Postfix) with SMTP id ACE56245C5; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:37:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from 83.171.153.46 (SquirrelMail authenticated user eos) by wwws.franken.de with HTTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:37:49 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Original-To: "David Kastrup" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34519 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34519 Hi David. David Kastrup said: >> I have not tested your change but I think your idea is good. > > Seconded. We don't want to _force_ w32 users to use bad shells. So should this be commited? Stephan -- Stephan Stahl