From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: decode_eol and inconsistent EOL
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:22:33 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <3028-Fri26Apr2002222232+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <E170n3M-0000tW-00@fencepost.gnu.org> <1438-Thu25Apr2002222156+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200204261738.g3QHcbl05147@aztec.santafe.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019849090 12979 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 19:24:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:24:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gildea@stop.mail-abuse.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 171BKs-0003NE-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:24:50 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 171BNe-0000WX-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:27:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 171BKg-0001Ny-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:24:38 -0400
Original-Received: from thor.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.11])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 171BIx-0001HD-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:22:52 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by thor.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.54-GA)
	with ESMTP id ADB53436;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:22:48 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <200204261738.g3QHcbl05147@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from
	Richard Stallman on Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 -0600 (MDT))
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3320
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3320

> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:38:37 -0600 (MDT)
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> 
> it could be that a mixture CRLFs with some extra CRs should be
> accepted as DOS-style.

Are we sure that Mac users (where a single CR is the EOL character)
won't object this?