From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bzr Emacs question Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:49:32 -0800 Organization: Newt Software Message-ID: <30168.1353790172@olgas.newt.com> References: <23373.1353776529@olgas.newt.com> <83pq32zyz5.fsf@gnu.org> <87vccuuc3w.fsf@olgas.newt.com> <83mwy6zx7z.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwy6uahn.fsf@olgas.newt.com> <83haoezq7s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353790182 29750 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2012 20:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 24 21:49:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcMff-0005F2-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:49:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcMfV-0002A9-20 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:49:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57933) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcMfR-00029v-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:49:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcMfQ-0004z2-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:49:37 -0500 Original-Received: from tassie.newt.com ([66.135.33.59]:33751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcMfO-0004yW-Q8; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:49:34 -0500 Original-Received: from olgas.newt.com (c-24-6-48-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.48.5]) by tassie.newt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93CE768155B; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:49:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by olgas.newt.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC7EF156253; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:49:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from olgas.newt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgas.newt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C904A15611F; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:49:32 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <83haoezq7s.fsf@gnu.org> Comments: In-reply-to Eli Zaretskii message dated "Sat, 24 Nov 2012 22:43:51 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3.1+bzr; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.2.1 X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 66.135.33.59 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155071 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Bill Wohler > > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:22:28 -0800 > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > >> From: Bill Wohler > > >> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:47:31 -0800 > > >> > > >> > A tag is not a revision-id by itself. Try > > >> > > > >> > bzr up -r tag:mh-e-8.3.1 > > >> > > >> Not surprisingly, that produces the same error. > > > > > > I guess I don't understand what your "bzr tag" command did. What is > > > "emacs-24.1" in that command? > > > > I want the mh-e-8.3.1 tag to correspond to the Emacs 24.1 release. I had > > assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that the emacs-24.1 tag was what I wanted. > > In what branch did you issue that "bzr tag" command? trunk. I also tried creating a branch of emacs-24, but got the same error there. > > >> > (And I'm not sure you really want "up" and not some other command, but > > >> > that's another story.) > > >> > > >> What would you recommend as an alternative to "svn up -r"? > > > > > > I don't know, I never used SVN seriously. What did you want to > > > accomplish? > > > > I want to grab the MH-E files associated with the Emacs 24.1 release in > > order to make an MH-E 8.3.1 release. > > If you want to update the tree to a certain revision, I think > "bzr revert" is a better choice, because "update" will leave any > uncommitted changes you might have. OK, thanks! -- Bill Wohler aka http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD