From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: ShengHuo ZHU Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (require 'mailabbrev) Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 23:33:03 -0500 Message-ID: <2naduj1dhc.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> References: <2npu3h9jpe.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <200202082324.g18NOHk05726@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013229927 22212 195.204.10.66 (9 Feb 2002 04:45:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Feb 2002 04:45:27 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16ZPOA-0005mA-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 05:45:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16ZPF8-0006k6-00; Fri, 08 Feb 2002 23:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from roc-24-58-72-167.rochester.rr.com ([24.58.72.167] helo=zsh.2y.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16ZPCQ-00065z-00; Fri, 08 Feb 2002 23:33:18 -0500 Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost) by zsh.2y.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g194X3X06601; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 23:33:03 -0500 Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Attribution: ZSH X-Face: #zw9`a=vHLkn+ZH8C (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:24:17 -0700 (MST)") Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:905 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:905 Richard Stallman writes: > Does this change fix the problem? > > I am thinking that it is wasteful to load sendmail.el > if the user is using message.el instead. Furthermore, mail-abbrev-in-expansion-header-p calls mail-header-end, which is defined in sendmail.el. So probably mail-header-end should be autoloaded if sendmail.el is not required by mailabbrev. ShengHuo _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel