From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Serious performance problem with process output on Mac OSX Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:38:35 +0800 Message-ID: <2f8855f41003301938ta78e180u9d4f26d60cf92962@mail.gmail.com> References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbo1iubm.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <87iq8ey981.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <2f8855f41003301039y1d159aacxbf9e33ba695d5dab@mail.gmail.com> <87k4stya52.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163630f3ebba985204830fa50e X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270003149 29246 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2010 02:39:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , Adrian Robert , Christian Lynbech , Emacs-Devel devel To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 04:39:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwnpf-0003jx-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:39:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwnpf-0005cs-AJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwnpa-0005aM-Ow for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51984 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwnpZ-0005YH-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwnpY-0003dE-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f185.google.com ([209.85.221.185]:37990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwnpX-0003dA-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:38:55 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk15 with SMTP id 15so4444735qyk.10 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:38:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kXQTWKBV+mzbwtIFpqoXGGYScXBD8wEWL2fzs2io4Js=; b=vwtc8CKgQIy+fQhdBcmWQdmFTo6UQ6NicV8tVvHda3nNGBERq9PEekduLobOLVCUVL s8GqSCZ689/DUloZ/P++7rpiko7XUkdsgwFDZ2y/rsWS8AIu27cAwABv32o2bBNTKxSP PgM1jNFwo4gcaLqYMGNQZ7Stgx2olz17ilHxM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=R42wTUAsXJ9ij5d1xn8xXITwGAxu80DJBALntJnwIxI/vRZ01k9j3DwpynRfkKO5Je RtwW5H8lo0Ug134QafLnO721bHWUMHeK7WLivqcHMup5vUvCcVlEzwomVUEVBhndIzUl bydX718prOCv+QLIRzTCPVy9UdrDvHYthgY7I= Original-Received: by 10.229.43.12 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:38:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4stya52.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Original-Received: by 10.229.231.132 with SMTP id jq4mr585695qcb.55.1270003135059; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:38:55 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122950 Archived-At: --00163630f3ebba985204830fa50e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Is this on the emacs-23 bzr branch? I don't see how this error would > arise from the patch, off the top of my head. > Yes. The prototype and the definition are different. The definition has an extra param called oldval. --00163630f3ebba985204830fa50e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is this on the emacs-23 bzr branch? =A0I don't see how this e= rror would
arise from the patch, off the top of my head.


Yes. The prototype and the definition are differ= ent. The definition has an extra param called oldval.


--00163630f3ebba985204830fa50e--